Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Article #19587Re: What good are Bios RAM tests ?
From: Mark Bergman
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 21:17
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 21:17
61 lines
2775 bytes
2775 bytes
In article <C18uoH.7GA@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu> ychung@cayley.uwaterloo.ca (Young Chung) writes:
>In article <1993Jan21.112136.2125@dmu.ac.uk> cph@dmu.ac.uk (Chris Hand) writes:
>>
>>People have been talking about the BIOS making a difference to the refresh,
>>but I would have thought it's the CHIPSET we should be looking at? After
>>all that's what controls the refresh, caching etc.
>>
>Well, I don't have the manuals with me to give any specifics about my
>machine, but I think the 3-chip parity problem is caused by the BIOS
>incompatibility.
>
>This is what happened to me.
>
>I had 4Meg of 9-chip simms and bought 4 more 3-chip simms. I installed it
>with ease and boot up. The computer would tick for 4Megs then hangup.
>CMOS chipset error! So, I turned off the above 1 meg memory check off and
>no problem. I then proceded to windows and decided to use all 8megs of
>memory. So I open up a BIG TGA file. Parity error in the middle of loading.
>So I put the 3-chip simms on the first bank (making them the first 4 megs).
>Now, CMOS error occurs as soon as it starts memory test. So I turn parity
>check off in my BIOS setup. Now, it runs with no problem. Windows gave me
>no trouble. Of course, when I installed OS/2 2.0, I stated getting that
>parity error again.
>But, my point is that since I was able to fix the problem, at least temporarily,
>I believe that it's the BIOS that causes 3-chip simm incompatibility.
>
>AMI Feb/91 (I think).
>
>
>----------
>Young :-) ychung@napier.uwaterloo.ca 3@#j3kdi$#%98sk30dskf@#sd.as..3k/sdf3lkdf
> ......##,3@!!!,#@##?P}{ -- I'm a .signature Virus!! --.
>
>
Well, I've got 4MB of 3 chip simms, and 4MB of 9 chip.
Haven't had a problem from day 1.
Environment:
Clone Motherboard
ETEQ Chipset
AMI Hi-Flex Bios dated 5/5/91
Relevant settings:
Concurrent Refresh: Disabled
Page Interleave: Enabled
DRAM Write wait state: 2W/S
DRAM Read wait state: 3W/S
RAS* Timeout mode counter: Disabled
Page mode: Enabled
Post write control: Disabled
CAS Pulse width: 3 CLK2
RAS Precharge time: 6 CLK2
RAS to CAS delay: 2 SYSCLK
----
Mark Bergman (Biker, Stagehand, (former) Unix user support grunt)
718-855-9148
bergman@panix.com
{cmcl2,uunet}!panix!bergman
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C1BsHF.JwF@panix.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!news.ans.net!cmcl2!panix!bergmanReferences:
<1jagkpINNarn@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> <1993Jan21.112136.2125@dmu.ac.uk> <C18uoH.7GA@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!news.ans.net!cmcl2!panix!bergman From: bergman@panix.com (Mark Bergman) Subject: Re: What good are Bios RAM tests ? Message-ID: <C1BsHF.JwF@panix.com> Organization: Panix Public Access Internet & Unix, NYC References: <1jagkpINNarn@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> <1993Jan21.112136.2125@dmu.ac.uk> <C18uoH.7GA@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 21:17:38 GMT Lines: 61