Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Article #19622Re: NEC 5FG convergence
From: Sean P. Frigo UW-Madison SRC (60...
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 16:47
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 16:47
51 lines
3439 bytes
3439 bytes
In article <1993Jan22.175607.2802@news.mentorg.com>, mikes@mikes.mentorg.com (Mike Stanbro) writes: >In article <1993Jan21.232244.10395@gandalf.ca>, ralleger@gandalf.ca (Bob Alleger) writes: >|> I recently purchased an NEC 5FG (actually my second, the first was DOA). >|> The only problem with this monitor is that the upper left-hand corner of >|> the screen is not as clear as the other quadrants. It seems that the >|> red gun is not in convergence with the green and blue guns. A simple >|> Windows-based test program that displays a dot pattern on a black background >|> shows this right away. Is it possible for an end user to adjust for this >|> without the need for expensive test hardware? If so, how? >|> . >|> > >Don't do it!!! I use to do convergence adjustments on TVs so I assumed that >I would be qualified to do it on a computer monitor as well. Well ... after >trying to converg two or three different monitors (including a NEC 4FG), I >have come to the embarrassing conclusion that computer monitors are beyond my >skills. > >Because you are sitting so close to the tube when you look at a monitor, the >gun alignment is critical. I believe that monitor manufacturers must >invest a lot of money and time in developing equipment to aid in the convergence >and alignment procedure during the assembly process. Mere mortals don't >stand a chance of duplicating their ability. > >Furthermore, it is my opinion that local computer repair technicians don't >have the equipment or practice to do a decent job either. If I were you, I >would continue to return the monitor until you get one you are satisfied with. >If you bought it locally, don't let the place you bought it from attempt to >mess with it. Yes, my local representative exclaimed "We've never seen this one before!" when I brought in my 5FG for warranty repair. What a fright... >There has been a lot of discussion in this news group about the poor quality >of the new NECs in terms of convergence and alignment. I went through three >4FGs until I got one that was OK. It is a real shame that NEC doesn't do a >better job of QA. I am on my 3rd 5FG and it displayed intermittent flyback transformer ringing the day after receipt and there are unlit pixels. I haven't gotten any reply from a 2 page letter to NEC yet. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sean P. Frigo internet: frigo@src.wisc.edu UW-Madison SRC and Department of Physics bitnet: frigo@wiscpsl 3731 Schneider Drive voice: 608-877-2332 Stoughton WI 53589-3097 fax: 608-877-2001 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan23.164758.3387@pslu1.psl.wisc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zazen!psl.wisc.edu!psl.wisc.edu!FRIGOReferences:
<1993Jan21.232244.10395@gandalf.ca>,<1993Jan22.175607.2802@news.mentorg.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zazen!psl.wisc.edu!psl.wisc.edu!FRIGO From: frigo@psl.wisc.edu (Sean P. Frigo UW-Madison SRC (608)877-2332,-2001(FAX)) Subject: Re: NEC 5FG convergence Message-ID: <1993Jan23.164758.3387@pslu1.psl.wisc.edu> Sender: news@pslu1.psl.wisc.edu (USENET News System) Reply-To: frigo@psl.wisc.edu Organization: University of Wisconsin - Physical Science Lab References: <1993Jan21.232244.10395@gandalf.ca>,<1993Jan22.175607.2802@news.mentorg.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 93 16:47:58 GMT Lines: 51