Re: 386DX/40 VS. 486SX/25

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware

Article #19733

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Previous Next

#19733

From: Bill Henning
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 21:01

4 lines
587 bytes

I've found the 386/40 w/ 64k cache to be faster than 25Mhz 486SX's, but your
mileage may vary according to your application.

Bill

Technical Details

Message-ID: <C0np34.9B7@wimsey.bc.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!gumby!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!van-bc!bhenning

References: <4566.73.uupcb@hal9k.ann-arbor.mi.us> <1993Jan4.141635.27338@dvorak.amd.com> <1993Jan05.132050.3801@openage.openage.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!gumby!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!van-bc!bhenning
From: bhenning@wimsey.bc.ca (Bill Henning)
Subject: Re: 386DX/40 VS. 486SX/25
Organization: Wimsey Information Services
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 21:01:51 GMT
Message-ID: <C0np34.9B7@wimsey.bc.ca>
References: <4566.73.uupcb@hal9k.ann-arbor.mi.us> <1993Jan4.141635.27338@dvorak.amd.com> <1993Jan05.132050.3801@openage.openage.com>
Lines: 4

Reply to Parent Message