Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Article #19747PS/2 95 vs 77 ?
From: Gene Mangum
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 18:35
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 18:35
18 lines
1465 bytes
1465 bytes
Hi, We're getting PC upgrades here at work. There are two categories: regular (non-PC literate) people are getting a PS/2 Model 77 486DX2 33-66, 8M, 212M HD. So called "high-end" users, myself included, are getting a PS/2 Model 95 486-DX2 25-50 (slower), 8M, 400M HD. Eariler doc I saw said that the 95 would be upgradable to the P5 when available, but I'm unable to find that now. Other than the larger HD, which is available on the 77's and the additional slots/bays which I doubt we'll ever get anything to use them for, I can't help feeling that us high-end user's are getting the shaft. Opinions? +=================================+=========================================+ | Gene Mangum | OS/2 ver 2 - Increased productivity | | Univ of Michigan Hospitals | through the use of a | | h198@hosp.med.umich.edu | "dead" operating system. | +=================================+=========================================+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19930125143555.h198@hosp.med.umich.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!news.itd.umich.edu!condor.hosp.med.umich.eduShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!news.itd.umich.edu!condor.hosp.med.umich.edu From: h198@hosp.med.umich.edu (Gene Mangum) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Subject: PS/2 95 vs 77 ? Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 14:35 EDT Organization: Univ of Michigan Hospitals Lines: 18 Distribution: world Message-ID: <19930125143555.h198@hosp.med.umich.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: condor.hosp.med.umich.edu X-Newsreader: FTPNuz (DOS) v1.0