🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Article #20365

Re: Diamond Speedstar 24X: Is it edible or poison?

#20365
From: Dave Beeman
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 17:26
14 lines
1251 bytes
In article <csjohn.728234175@watson.mtsu.edu>, csjohn@watson.mtsu.edu (John Wallace) writes:
|> What do you think of the Diamond Speedstar 24X?
|> Is it a good card for DOS, Windows, OS/2, and/or Unix?
|> 

If you plan to use Linux or 386BSD with Xfree386 (the free X-windows
package) you will have a hard time getting drivers for any Diamond products,
as they use proprietary code which isn't available to the developers of
Xfree386.  You will get better performance at a comparable price from one of
the cards based on the new S3 86c801 chip, like the Actix GraphicsEngine
32.  My Actix card is blazingly fast with Windows and DOS and the benchmarks
I've seen for unix/X are comparable to a SUN Sparc II.

Dave Beeman
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1993Jan28.172631.16235@colorado.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!boulder!dogstar!dbeeman
References: <csjohn.728234175@watson.mtsu.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!boulder!dogstar!dbeeman
From: dbeeman@dogstar.Colorado.edu (Dave Beeman)
Subject: Re: Diamond Speedstar 24X: Is it edible or poison?
Message-ID: <1993Jan28.172631.16235@colorado.edu>
Sender: news@colorado.edu (The Daily Planet)
Nntp-Posting-Host: dogstar.colorado.edu
Reply-To: dbeeman@dogstar.colorado.edu
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
References:  <csjohn.728234175@watson.mtsu.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 17:26:31 GMT
Lines: 14