Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #10265Re: Is FDFORMAT OK? (Was: double to high density diskette convert??)
From: robert.k.nichols
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 01:32
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 01:32
25 lines
1843 bytes
1843 bytes
In article <1992Dec11.204253.26900@cs.mcgill.ca> spader@statler.cs.mcgill.ca (Yoo-Shin LEE) writes: >I'd also like to know about programs such as FDformat which allow you >to format for 2 mbs on a hd disk. Are they safe and reliable? >I have a friend who used to always fdformat(2meg) his disks and use the >double hole punch routine. His 1.44 meg drive is screwed now and doesn't >copy reliably. I think it is because of his abuse of the above methods. ... FDFORMAT is OK. It still records are the rated bit density of the media. It really doesn't have much choice, since the hardware enforces the transfer rate based on the media type. There is one potential danger for 5.25" drives only. In a 5.25" HD drive, FDFORMAT can put 80 tracks on a 360K disk that would normally have only 40 tracks. If you try to access such a disk without the FDREAD TSR loaded, you can bang the seek mechanism against the stop, since the controller will be set up to double-step to accommodate the standard 360K disk format. As for punching a hole to convert 3.5" DD disks to HD, that will cause data to be recorded unreliably, but it shouldn't hurt the drive unless plastic debris was left inside the shell (from drilling, rather than punching, the hole). Bob Nichols AT&T Bell Laboratories rnichols@ihlpm.ih.att.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec12.013225.13595@cbfsb.cb.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!pacbell.com!att-out!cbfsb!cbnewsg.cb.att.com!rnicholsReferences:
<1992Dec8.145201.61800@cc.usu.edu> <1992Dec11.204253.26900@cs.mcgill.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!pacbell.com!att-out!cbfsb!cbnewsg.cb.att.com!rnichols From: rnichols@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (robert.k.nichols) Subject: Re: Is FDFORMAT OK? (Was: double to high density diskette convert??) Message-ID: <1992Dec12.013225.13595@cbfsb.cb.att.com> Sender: news@cbfsb.cb.att.com Organization: AT&T References: <1992Dec8.145201.61800@cc.usu.edu> <1992Dec11.204253.26900@cs.mcgill.ca> Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 01:32:25 GMT Lines: 25