Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #10301Re: Stacker ate my hard disk again. :( help....
From: John P. Mechalas
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 16:38
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 16:38
22 lines
1647 bytes
1647 bytes
In article <1992Dec14.150447.4552@fcom.cc.utah.edu> dks8475@u.cc.utah.edu (David Kenneth Slack/Music) writes: > >I have been running Stacker 2.0, and I've had no problems at all with it. >When I ran the earlier version I would run into those kind of problems, >but 2.0 is (IMHO) 100% more stable than 1.x. I'm sure 3.0 wouldn't be >LESS stable. <smile> > >Good luck... Actually, I have been running 1.x because I have other things to spend my money on than the upgrades, and have neevr had *any* problems with it whatsoeevr. On the other hand, I keep seeing the horror stories about 2.0 write-protecting the volumes. I don't think Stacker itself is unstable...either the 1.x or 2.0 or 3.0 versions, in so much as the comation of Stacker + some operating systems + some drivers + some motherboards is unstable. In other words, it no more unstable than any other program. -- John Mechalas "I'm not an actor, but mechalas@gn.ecn.purdue.edu I play one on TV." Aero Engineering, Purdue University #include disclaimer.h
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec14.163801.27783@gn.ecn.purdue.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!sdd.hp.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!gn.ecn.purdue.edu!mechalasReferences:
<Bz6vHx.12z@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Dec14.150447.4552@fcom.cc.utah.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!sdd.hp.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!gn.ecn.purdue.edu!mechalas From: mechalas@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (John P. Mechalas) Subject: Re: Stacker ate my hard disk again. :( help.... Message-ID: <1992Dec14.163801.27783@gn.ecn.purdue.edu> Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network References: <Bz6vHx.12z@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Dec14.150447.4552@fcom.cc.utah.edu> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 92 16:38:01 GMT Lines: 22