Re: Stacker ate my hard disk again. : ( help....

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc

Article #10306

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Previous Next

#10306

From: Fuzzy Fox
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 21:29

15 lines
1090 bytes

mechalas@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (John P. Mechalas) writes:

>   I don't think Stacker itself is unstable...either the 1.x or 2.0 or 3.0
>versions, in so much as the comation of Stacker + some operating systems +
>some drivers + some motherboards is unstable.  In other words, it no more
>unstable than any other program.

My experience seems to indicate that Stacker is as (un)stable as the
person using it.

-- 
#ifdef TRUE        | Fuzzy Fox (a.k.a. David DeSimone)       fuzzy@netcom.com
#define  TRUE   0  |
#define  FALSE  1  |  "You have been recruited by the Star League to defend
#endif             |     the Frontier against Xur and the Kodan Armada."

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Dec14.212902.1390@rei.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!rei2!fox

References: <Bz6vHx.12z@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Dec14.150447.4552@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <1992Dec14.163801.27783@gn.ecn.purdue.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!rei2!fox
From: fox@rei.com (Fuzzy Fox)
Subject: Re: Stacker ate my hard disk again. : ( help....
Message-ID: <1992Dec14.212902.1390@rei.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 21:29:02 GMT
References: <Bz6vHx.12z@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Dec14.150447.4552@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <1992Dec14.163801.27783@gn.ecn.purdue.edu>
Organization: Recognition Equipment, Inc.
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message