Re: Stacker ate my hard disk again. : ( help....

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc

Article #10312

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Previous Next

#10312

From: RFM
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 02:48

16 lines
1206 bytes

In article <1992Dec14.212902.1390@rei.com>, fox@rei.com (Fuzzy Fox) says:
>
>>   I don't think Stacker itself is unstable...either the 1.x or 2.0 or 3.0
>>versions, in so much as the comation of Stacker + some operating systems +
>>some drivers + some motherboards is unstable.  In other words, it no more
>>unstable than any other program.
>
>My experience seems to indicate that Stacker is as (un)stable as the
>person using it.
>
I take exception to this. I am as unstable as they come, but my STACKER
1.0 has been plunking along in a 20-meg notebook for 18 months or so.
I've got an unopened copy of Stacker 2.0 -- I'm afraid to mess with
what's been working ok up 'till now.

BobM, PSU-Harrisburg

Technical Details

Message-ID: <92349.214819RFM@psuvm.psu.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!rfm

References:

<Bz6vHx.12z@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Dec14.150447.4552@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <1992Dec14.163801.27783@gn.ecn.purdue.edu> <1992Dec14.212902.1390@rei.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!rfm
Organization: Penn State University
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 21:48:18 EST
From: <RFM@psuvm.psu.edu>
Message-ID: <92349.214819RFM@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Stacker ate my hard disk again. : ( help....
References: <Bz6vHx.12z@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
 <1992Dec14.150447.4552@fcom.cc.utah.edu>
 <1992Dec14.163801.27783@gn.ecn.purdue.edu> <1992Dec14.212902.1390@rei.com>
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message