Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #10589Re: Re: MSDOS 5.0 vs DRDOS 6.0
From: Frank Slootweg CRC
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 14:39
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 14:39
25 lines
1586 bytes
1586 bytes
duck@nuustak.csir.co.za (Paul Ducklin) writes: > IMHO, there are 2 ways to go with DOS right now -- either DR-DOS 6.0 > or MS-DOS 3.30. A few hassles I've had with DR's offering have > annoyed me: "slow" floppy drives [why, BTW?]; ... [deleted] > Interestingly, most of the cool > utils from DR-6.0 work fine under MS-3.30 [eg: SUPERPCK, ... Only the *first* access (after insertion) to a floppy is slow because DR DOS 6.0 reads in the whole FAT for later faster access. This is documented in one of the information files on Novell's BBS and FTP system (no pointers handy, but can try to find them). If you use Super PC-Kwik then all subsequent accesses to your floppies will be very fast. (On my system) There is however always a very short access (floppy drive light) even if the data is already in the cache (and the volume-change detection is working correctly). I never understood why that is. I had the same "problem" with HyperDisk (do not remember which version, but can find out). > Buy DR-DOS 6.0. I doubt you'll regret it. [Or ditch DOS altogether :-)]. Words of immortal wisdom! Frank Slootweg
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<26790027@hpuamsa.neth.hp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!scd.hp.com!hpscdm!hplextra!hpcc05!hpbbn!hpuamsa!franksReferences:
<duck.722123908@nuustak>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: franks@hpuamsa.neth.hp.com (Frank Slootweg CRC) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 14:39:13 GMT Subject: Re: Re: MSDOS 5.0 vs DRDOS 6.0 Message-ID: <26790027@hpuamsa.neth.hp.com> Organization: Hewlett-Packard, The Netherlands Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!scd.hp.com!hpscdm!hplextra!hpcc05!hpbbn!hpuamsa!franks Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc References: <duck.722123908@nuustak> Lines: 25