Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #11004Re: Help! Where's the lost 128K memory?
From: Terje Th|gersen
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1991 20:30
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1991 20:30
44 lines
2706 bytes
2706 bytes
In article <1991Jun10.213213.5317@beaver.cs.washington.edu> kailun@cs.washington.edu (Kai-Lun Chan) writes:
In article <91161.105003TKUSTER@auvm.american.edu> you write:
>In article <1991Jun8.201349.14697@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>,
>cwang@copper.ucs.indiana.edu (Ted Wang) says:
>>
>>Hello! I have a 80386-25 based PC with 64K cached memory and 4MB RAM.
>>It uses a noname motherboard and AMI BIOS. When I turn on the
>>computer, it does self memory testing and says 3968 OK instead of 4096
>>OK. I thought that this might because of the SIMMs, so I pulled out
>>the SIMMs ( four 1MBx9 SIMMs) in my computer and plugged into my
>>friend's computer and everything's fine (I mean he got 4096 OK message
>
>
>I have a similar occurence but it isn't a problem. 64k goes towards
>Bios Shadowing and 64k goes towards video shadowing. This memory
>doesn't appear during the memory test. You should try going into
>setup and see if you have these features. If you want the full
>4mb of RAM you may be able to disable the shadowing.
>
>I hope this is your problem
>
>Later...
I have a similar problem, too. Even if I disable the shadowing, only
3712K (640 + 3072) appears during the memory test. Does it mean that
the 384K cannot be used in any other way?
kailun
It depends on your chipset and BIOS. On my Intel chipset + AMI BIOS
386sx I can put the 'shadow' RAM back into the memory pool, but on a
differen 386sx here, with Phoenix BIOS and Chips chipset, this cannot
be done.
Regards,
-Terje
--
____________________________________________________________________________
thoger@solan.unit.no | Institute of Physical Chemistry
THOGER AT NORUNIT.BITNET | Div. of Computer Assisted Instrumental Analysis
| Norwegian Institute of Technology
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<THOGER.91Jun11223037@lise21.solan.unit.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!ugle.unit.no!ugle.runit.sintef.no!thogerReferences:
<1991Jun8.201349.14697@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> <91161.105003TKUSTER@auvm.american.edu> <1991Jun10.213213.5317@beaver.cs.washington.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!ugle.unit.no!ugle.runit.sintef.no!thoger From: thoger@solan.unit.no (Terje Th|gersen) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: Help! Where's the lost 128K memory? Message-ID: <THOGER.91Jun11223037@lise21.solan.unit.no> Date: 11 Jun 91 20:30:37 GMT References: <1991Jun8.201349.14697@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> <91161.105003TKUSTER@auvm.american.edu> <1991Jun10.213213.5317@beaver.cs.washington.edu> Sender: news@ugle.unit.no Organization: Institute of Physical Chemistry, NTH Lines: 44 In-Reply-To: kailun@cs.washington.edu's message of 10 Jun 91 21:32:13 GMT