🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #11004

Re: Help! Where's the lost 128K memory?

#11004
From: Terje Th|gersen
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1991 20:30
44 lines
2706 bytes
In article <1991Jun10.213213.5317@beaver.cs.washington.edu> kailun@cs.washington.edu (Kai-Lun Chan) writes:


     In article <91161.105003TKUSTER@auvm.american.edu> you write:
     >In article <1991Jun8.201349.14697@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>,
     >cwang@copper.ucs.indiana.edu (Ted Wang) says:
     >>
     >>Hello!  I have a 80386-25 based PC with 64K cached memory and 4MB RAM.
     >>It uses a noname motherboard and AMI BIOS.  When I turn on the
     >>computer, it does self memory testing and says 3968 OK instead of 4096
     >>OK.  I thought that this might because of the SIMMs, so I pulled out
     >>the SIMMs ( four 1MBx9 SIMMs) in my computer and plugged into my
     >>friend's computer and everything's fine (I mean he got 4096 OK message
     >
     >
     >I have a similar occurence but it isn't a problem.  64k goes towards
     >Bios Shadowing and 64k goes towards video shadowing.  This memory
     >doesn't appear during the memory test.  You should try going into
     >setup and see if you have these features.  If you want the full
     >4mb of RAM you may be able to disable the shadowing.
     >
     >I hope this is your problem
     >
     >Later...

   I have a similar problem, too.  Even if I disable the shadowing, only
   3712K (640 + 3072) appears during the memory test.  Does it mean that
   the 384K cannot be used in any other way?

   kailun

It depends on your chipset and BIOS.  On my Intel chipset + AMI BIOS
386sx I can put the 'shadow' RAM back into the memory pool, but on a
differen 386sx here, with Phoenix BIOS and Chips chipset, this cannot
be done.

Regards,
  -Terje

--
____________________________________________________________________________
thoger@solan.unit.no       |                 Institute of Physical Chemistry
THOGER AT NORUNIT.BITNET   | Div. of Computer Assisted Instrumental Analysis
                           |               Norwegian Institute of Technology
Technical Details
Message-ID: <THOGER.91Jun11223037@lise21.solan.unit.no>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!ugle.unit.no!ugle.runit.sintef.no!thoger
References: <1991Jun8.201349.14697@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> <91161.105003TKUSTER@auvm.american.edu> <1991Jun10.213213.5317@beaver.cs.washington.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!ugle.unit.no!ugle.runit.sintef.no!thoger
From: thoger@solan.unit.no (Terje Th|gersen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Help! Where's the lost 128K memory?
Message-ID: <THOGER.91Jun11223037@lise21.solan.unit.no>
Date: 11 Jun 91 20:30:37 GMT
References: <1991Jun8.201349.14697@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>
 <91161.105003TKUSTER@auvm.american.edu>
 <1991Jun10.213213.5317@beaver.cs.washington.edu>
Sender: news@ugle.unit.no
Organization: Institute of Physical Chemistry, NTH
Lines: 44
In-Reply-To: kailun@cs.washington.edu's message of 10 Jun 91 21:32:13 GMT