DOS 5 and memory management

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc

Article #11171

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Previous Next

#11171

From: Chris Brewster
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1991 21:11

8 lines
640 bytes

Since the new DOS has paging and task switching, I'm unclear on what is still
needed from a memory manager.  Is QEMM or MAX still useful?

Christopher Brewster
Cray Research Inc.
612: 683-5759
cb@cray.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <CB.91Jun17133909@tamarack12.timbuk>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!van-bc!ubc-cs!unixg.ubc.ca!brazeau.ucs.ualberta.ca!alberta!aunro!ukma!rex!spool.mu.edu!cs.umn.edu!uc!shamash!timbuk!cb

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!van-bc!ubc-cs!unixg.ubc.ca!brazeau.ucs.ualberta.ca!alberta!aunro!ukma!rex!spool.mu.edu!cs.umn.edu!uc!shamash!timbuk!cb
From: cb@tamarack12.timbuk (Chris Brewster)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: DOS 5 and memory management
Message-ID: <CB.91Jun17133909@tamarack12.timbuk>
Date: 17 Jun 91 21:11:53 GMT
Organization: pubs
Lines: 8