Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #1134OS for pc-hardware
From: Keith P Vaitkus
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 23:26
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 23:26
51 lines
3170 bytes
3170 bytes
I am looking to buy a 486 system in the next month. I guess that Im going with the PC architecture because it's so @#$% *CHEAP* right now, but I have many reservations about this platform because of the operating system.... I have been a unix user, albeit not a guru or a sys admin, and Ive gotten used to the features of sun sparcs stations and the NeXt stations (which uses Mach -- which I understand to be a friendlier, more compact version of Unix). I don't want to give up such features as large (by PC standards) workspaces (somewhere around 1000x1000) and 15+'' monitors. I also use and like Xwindows and demand a flat memory model. (640K is just *unbelievable* with todays technology level!) I am going to pass over the idea of a 'personal workstation' because not only is the hardware too much for me right now (ala $7,000 for a color system from NeXt), but the software is just wayyyyyy to pricy for an individual. (Even a small company really.) I am also considering a Mac or Amiga platform, but like I said before, the PC market is so cheap, you really can't beat it. Anyway, I need some advice about an OS for a 486 machine. I have three goals in mind: 1) I want to run PC games. (Always a stickler for compatibility...) 2) I will use a few commercial programs, such as a word processor, spreadsheet, etc. 3) I will do my own programming and would *really* like a system that has some graphical libraries like Xwindows and Xt or NextStep (I hear) to do quick GUI code. This is an area that really seems to be lacking everywhere I look, except perhaps the NeXt. So what can you'all advise me about an os? I could live with rebooting the machine when I want to play a game, I guess. I don't want to deal with DOS or MS windows and all of the memory kludges and headaches that go along them, but I also don't want to be without any programs except the ones I hack myself... What does OS2 have to offer? And how does it compare to unix? (Besides during installation.) How feasible is it to have a computer that runs alternate operating systems? I'm not a hardware genius so keep these answers in simple english if you can.... Now I really *DON'T* want to start an OS flame-war. I just want some good advice from people that have used PC unix's, os2, and maybe some of the other machines (Amigas or Macs) as well. I know that DOS has 'millions' of programs out that, and that "I ought to stay compatible with them", but I have realized that this is not really an issue for me. Most of those older PC programs either weren't very good, had bugs, or just don't apply to my needs. I want a machine to move *forward* not *backwards*. Thanks in advance -Keith
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug26.232602.23786@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!news.oc.com!spssig.spss.com!uchinews!msuinfo!oyster.cps.msu.edu!vaitkusShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!news.oc.com!spssig.spss.com!uchinews!msuinfo!oyster.cps.msu.edu!vaitkus From: vaitkus@oyster.cps.msu.edu (Keith P Vaitkus) Subject: OS for pc-hardware Message-ID: <1992Aug26.232602.23786@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> Sender: news@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, Michigan State University Date: Wed, 26 Aug 92 23:26:02 GMT Lines: 51