Re: Is DOS 5.0 really so slooow!

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc

Article #11366

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Previous Next

#11366

From: Jerry Natowitz
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 1991 13:45

13 lines
1143 bytes

In article <1991Jun23.034521.7819@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> gwni@troi.cc.rochester.edu (G. Wayne Nichols) writes:
>My experience indicates that any use of HIMEM.SYS will dramatically
>slow down the Landmark rating, if not your actual system.

I have played around with various configurations and found that EMM386 seems
to be the culprit - my apps are runjning in protected mode when I use it for
upper memeory access.  I don't even have to do any devicehighs or loadhighs,
just having emm386 noems is enough.  Maybe I'll try removing himem for laughs.
-- 
     Jerry Natowitz
     Guest user on:
ARPA jin@ursa-major.spdcc.com
UUCP {ima,harvard,rayssd,linus,m2c}!spdcc!jin

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8043@spdcc.SPDCC.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!mintaka!spdcc!jin

References: <1991Jun20.223605.18977@IRO.UMontreal.CA> <1991Jun23.034521.7819@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!mintaka!spdcc!jin
From: jin@spdcc.COM (Jerry Natowitz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Is DOS 5.0 really so slooow!
Keywords: Landmark
Message-ID: <8043@spdcc.SPDCC.COM>
Date: 23 Jun 91 13:45:22 GMT
References: <1991Jun20.223605.18977@IRO.UMontreal.CA> <1991Jun23.034521.7819@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>
Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message