Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #1152Re: OS for pc-hardware
From: Norbert Bladt
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 08:15
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 08:15
56 lines
3125 bytes
3125 bytes
vaitkus@oyster.cps.msu.edu (Keith P Vaitkus) writes: >I am looking to buy a 486 system in the next month. I guess that Im going with >the PC architecture because it's so @#$% *CHEAP* right now, but I have many >reservations about this platform because of the operating system.... >I have been a unix user, albeit not a guru or a sys admin, and Ive gotten used to >the features of sun sparcs stations and the NeXt stations (which uses Mach -- >which I understand to be a friendlier, more compact version of Unix). I don't >want to give up such features as large (by PC standards) workspaces (somewhere >around 1000x1000) and 15+'' monitors. >I also use and like Xwindows and demand a flat memory model. (640K is just >*unbelievable* with todays technology level!) There are several commercial UNIXes available. But, you seem to be short on $$$ (just like me :-) ), so you want to spend the money on good hardware instead of, at least sometimes, expensive and lousy software without support and sources to compensate for that. I am planning to use 386BSD on the system I will get next week (I hope, to get it finally). As mentioned in the other follow-up posting, you have to be careful to select the right hardware pieces if you want to run UNIX on a PC (386 or 486) hardware. This is not just the SVGA-Boards for X-Windows but also the type of Bus (ISA, EISA, ISA+local-bus, EISA+local-bus) etc. I did install 386BSD (base system with GNU c, c++, groff, etc.) in about 2 hours on a no-name 486/25 Mhz box with 100 MB Conner Harddisk. I have a 25 MByte MS-DOS partition and the rest is used by 386BSD. Because the ethernet controller didn't work (hardware problem - checksum error in address ROM) I had to install the system from 10 3.5" floppies. You should look at this system, too. You can get X-Windows (for the ET-4000 based VGA boards) for it. The newsgroup for discussing this, the FAQ, etc. is comp.unix.bsd. Take a look there. Of course, if you want to do real development for a customer and he insists on using Informix, Oracle, etc. as the database management system, you have to choose another UNIX system, like Interactive UNIX, SCO (oops), Dell UNIX, etc. I am sorry that this list is not complete but I can't remember all those names in the game. Hope this helps, Norbert. P.S. The installation of 386BSD was a complete success the first time I tried it. "Thank you very much" goes to the Jolitz's (sp ?) and all the other contributors to this system. -- Norbert Bladt, Ascom Autelca AG, Worbstr. 201, CH-3073 Guemligen, Switzerland Phone: +41 31 999 65 52 FAX: +41 31 999 65 44 Mail: nbladt@autelca.ascom.ch UUCP: ..!uunet!mcsun!chsun!hslrswi!aut!nbladt
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug27.081532.9898@autelca.ascom.ch>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!chsun!hslrswi!aut!nbladtReferences:
<1992Aug26.232602.23786@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!chsun!hslrswi!aut!nbladt From: nbladt@autelca.ascom.ch (Norbert Bladt) Subject: Re: OS for pc-hardware Message-ID: <1992Aug27.081532.9898@autelca.ascom.ch> Organization: Ascom Autelca AG, Guemligen, Switzerland References: <1992Aug26.232602.23786@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 08:15:32 GMT Lines: 56