Re: Stacker vs. Superstor

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc

Article #11761

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Previous Next

#11761

From: Mr. Mark L. Cohen
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 15:21

11 lines
1038 bytes

I have been using Stacker 2.0 for the last year or so and I have had no 
problems at all that weren't my fault.  The one thing that I did do was
to repartition my hard disk.  On my 200MB drive, I decided that I would
use 160 MB for my Stacker drive and then I left 40 MB unstacked.  What I
do is install all my applications on the Stacker drive and I put all my
data on the unstacked drive.  This not only helps me stay organized, but
if for whatever reason the Stacker drive gets corrupted, I just need to
restore my applications.  

  Mark Cohen
  marklc@umbc4.umbc.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1jmf1qINN2si@umbc4.umbc.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!news.umbc.edu!nobody

References: <1993Jan20.093942.91017@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au> <1993Jan20.171246.2810@bmers95.bnr.ca>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!news.umbc.edu!nobody
From: marklc@umbc.edu (Mr. Mark L. Cohen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Stacker vs. Superstor
Date: 21 Jan 1993 10:21:30 -0500
Organization: University of Maryland, Baltimore County Campus
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <1jmf1qINN2si@umbc4.umbc.edu>
References: <1993Jan20.093942.91017@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au> <1993Jan20.171246.2810@bmers95.bnr.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: umbc4.umbc.edu

Reply to Parent Message