Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #11796Re: Difference between Turbo C++ and Borland C++
From: Mark Harrison
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:41
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:41
53 lines
3072 bytes
3072 bytes
In article <watson.727725334@mariner.sce.carleton.ca> watson@sce.carleton.ca (Stephen Watson) writes:
>[note: followups set to c.s.i.p.m only]
>
>kkuehl@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (Kevin Kuehl) writes:
>
>Me too, please! I've got TC++ Professional (v1), and I'm thinking of
>upgrading. I definitely want templates, and fixes for all the stuff
>wrong with TC++v1. Am I correct in my impression that *Turbo* C++ now
>has a v3, distinct from *Borland* C++ v3?
Absolutly and totally different. Plus there's Turbo for DOS and Turbo for
Windows. They are separate packages.
> TurboVision looks
>interesting too, as I'm doing some frameworks stuff at school (but I
>believe I need min 2MB RAM in my machine?). And speaking of platform
>upgrades, how much disk do these things take up?
I've heard the full Borland with App. Frameworks takes up from 30-50Meg.
I don't know since I have Turbo C/C++ for DOS. It takes up about 15 for
the full installation I think.
> I'm contemplating
>spending up to $1000 (from savings: I'm a starving student ;-) on new
>h/w and s/w; I want to make sure I'll be happy with the result! I
>notice that the "extra memory" add-on to the FAQ in
>comp.os.msdos.programmer says that BC++ works transparently (i.e.
>"new/delete" still do their stuff) with the Pharlap 16-bit extender;
>does the same apply to TC++?
Have no clue.
>(I have a bone to pick with Borland about this: I keep getting
>mailings about Quattro-Pro (for what? So I can balance my
>cheque-book?), Paradox, and Borland C++ (I don't do Windows!), but
>nary a word about improvements/fixes to Turbo ;-(
Couldn't agree more. I've gotten enough just mail for Quattro-Pro and
Paradox to fill a room. But no news on Turbo C/C++.
>Note: like Kevin, I'm not doing commercial programming, and I'm NOT
>doing Windows.
The only differences that I know of are that you don't get a Windows
compiler (unless you get Turbo for Windows. Then you don't get a DOS
compiler.) You don't get Turbo Vision. You don't get the full-featured
debugger (though the one incorperated into the IDE is more than enough for
me.) And you don't get the assembler TASM.
--
=============================================================================
Mark Harrison | "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx
harrison@sun.lclark.edu | Our great computers fill the hallowed halls."
-- Me | -- Rush
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan22.204116.13928@lclark.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!srvr1.engin.umich.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!henson!reed!lclark!harrisonReferences:
<1993Jan21.175238.23743@cbfsb.cb.att.com> <watson.727725334@mariner.sce.carleton.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!srvr1.engin.umich.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!henson!reed!lclark!harrison From: harrison@lclark.edu (Mark Harrison) Subject: Re: Difference between Turbo C++ and Borland C++ Message-ID: <1993Jan22.204116.13928@lclark.edu> Keywords: C++, IBM PC, Borland Organization: Lewis & Clark College, Portland OR References: <1993Jan21.175238.23743@cbfsb.cb.att.com> <watson.727725334@mariner.sce.carleton.ca> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 20:41:16 GMT Lines: 53