Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #12273Re: good positive action keyboard similar to old Lexmarks??
From: Keith R. Williams
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 00:00
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 00:00
46 lines
3174 bytes
3174 bytes
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999 16:38:09, Usenet@NavasGrp.Dublin.CA.US (John Navas) wrote: > [POSTED TO alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt] > krw@ibm.net (Keith R. Williams) wrote: > > >On Thu, 18 Feb 1999 18:05:20, Usenet@NavasGrp.Dublin.CA.US (John > >Navas) wrote: > > > >> [POSTED TO alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt] > >> "Actarus [VL]" <prince_actarus@videotron.ca> wrote: > >> > >> >John Navas wrote: > >> >> > >> >> [POSTED TO alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt] > >> >> krw@ibm.net (Keith R. Williams) wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >Track-point. They're OK, but the track-points have a memory. If > >> >> >you go from one end of the screen to the other the cursor will > >> >> >drift for a while. The strain-guages aren't perfect. > >> >> > >> >> FWIW, I haven't seen a problem like that. > >> > > >> >Trackpoints on ThinkPads have that 'autoadjust' feature, so it's > >> >possible sometimes the cursor will drift a little... > >> > >> FWIW, mine have never done that. > > > >You're certainly lucky. Mine does and it's a pain! I carry a > >mouse in my suitcase and when I go by car, a keyboard. The stick > >is better than any other solutin I've seen for a mobile, but it's > >nowhere near perfect. > > Did you try to get it fixed under warranty? Nope. It's the same on any ThinkPad and IBM keybard with the TrackPoint I've used. Maybe I'm just more sensitive (or more abusive) than most. This isn't an uncommon complaint about track-points though. Again, I still like them for mobiles. I use them in the lab where I have systems stacked ear-to-ear. They are not perfect. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. ;-) ---- Keith
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<pLMYl5dhX7hK-pn2-zoxbBT0ck31X@localhost>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<7671c1$sje$1@ash.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <36917bfc.65418813@news1.newscene.com> <368ad909.0@news3.ibm.net> <pLMYl5dhX7hK-pn2-9mmIUSTupcdE@localhost> <36d4dd88.3971186@news.ncal.verio.com> <36CC3F46.6565667D@videotron.ca> <36d2562b.771071@news.ncal.verio.com> <pLMYl5dhX7hK-pn2-klPRwldFoek3@localhost> <36ce935a.378107828@news.ncal.verio.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102579,abc994a9b2b8a5e8 X-Google-Attributes: gid102579,public X-Google-Thread: 11196f,abc994a9b2b8a5e8 X-Google-Attributes: gid11196f,public X-Google-Thread: f53ba,abc994a9b2b8a5e8 X-Google-Attributes: gidf53ba,public X-Google-Thread: 109e38,abc994a9b2b8a5e8 X-Google-Attributes: gid109e38,public X-Google-Thread: 10a2ed,abc994a9b2b8a5e8 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a2ed,public From: krw@ibm.net (Keith R. Williams) Subject: Re: good positive action keyboard similar to old Lexmarks?? Date: 1999/02/20 Message-ID: <pLMYl5dhX7hK-pn2-zoxbBT0ck31X@localhost> X-Deja-AN: 446291140 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: <7671c1$sje$1@ash.prod.itd.earthlink.net> <36917bfc.65418813@news1.newscene.com> <368ad909.0@news3.ibm.net> <pLMYl5dhX7hK-pn2-9mmIUSTupcdE@localhost> <36d4dd88.3971186@news.ncal.verio.com> <36CC3F46.6565667D@videotron.ca> <36d2562b.771071@news.ncal.verio.com> <pLMYl5dhX7hK-pn2-klPRwldFoek3@localhost> <36ce935a.378107828@news.ncal.verio.com> X-Notice: should be reported to postmaster@ibm.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Complaints-To: postmaster@ibm.net X-Trace: 20 Feb 1999 03:15:12 GMT, 32.101.168.143 Organization: IBM Global Services - Remote Access Mail & News Services MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: krw@ibm.net Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,fj.comp.dev.keyboard,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.systems