IBM vs. Amiga: What are the facts?

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc

Article #1335

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Previous Next

#1335

From: Mark Skaff
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 22:39

10 lines
912 bytes

Can someone who is highly (or just knows something) knowledgable in IBM and 
Amiga please tell me a few facts about why IBM really is better? I do know 
some myself, but I need some help in this. For example, what is faster; A 
68030-40 vs. 486dx-33? And What type of IBM do you need to get the 
multitasking capablities of an A500? And other things that could help. 
Please sned me answers in mail, ebcause I don't want a debate to begin in 
here! Thanks.

---
mskaff@tsaroth.isis.org                              Ottawa, Ontario

Technical Details

Message-ID: <a5HaqB1w164w@uuisis.isis.org>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!cunews!revcan!micor!uuisis!bbs

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!cunews!revcan!micor!uuisis!bbs
From: mskaff@uuisis.isis.org (Mark Skaff)
Subject: IBM vs. Amiga: What are the facts?
Organization: International Shared Information Service (Ottawa)
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 92 22:39:27 GMT
Message-ID: <a5HaqB1w164w@uuisis.isis.org>
Sender: bbs@uuisis.isis.org
Lines: 10