🚀 go-pugleaf

georged@sequent.com (George Dolbier) writes:

>In article <1992Aug21.231603.3615@darwin.ntu.edu.au> nunn@nutmeg.cs.ntu.edu.au (JsNO  BAR---NUNN) writes:

>Your-a preachin' to d quier brother.

>Msdos was never designed to do multitasking. It was never part of the "spec".
This is the first time I see the words "Design" and "spec" in conjunction with
MooSe-DOS... I doubt if MooSe-DOS was ever designed. Furthermore I'm not sure
if you mean undocumented or documented specs.

>>that a lot of people have got rich just by inventing ways of managing this
>>better! (eg QEMM drivers).
>Msdos does not clame to do ANY memory management.
Hmmm, I just wonder why there is all this UMB stuff in MooSe-DOS 5.

In fact, MooSe-DOS does not claim to do ANYTHING, like almost any program. So
that's not a reason why we can't expect to have '90s power in the '90s.

Greetings,
Peter Busser