🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #1600

Re: Borland C++ vs Turbo C++

#1600
From: David J W Emrich
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1992 14:56
21 lines
982 bytes
tklancar@galaxy.gov.bc.ca writes:

>In article <1992Sep6.184924.3701@cc.umontreal.ca>, rahmanqi@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Rahman Qazi Ibadur) writes:
>> Hello,
>> 
>>   I am thinking of buying TC++ or BC++. Can anyone tell me the diffrence between these two borland products.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> rahmanqi@brise.ERE.UMontreal.ca


>I believe that Borland C++ includes the ability to create Windows programs,
>whereas Turbo C++ does not.

I'm getting confused, Borland writes all the Turbo products, so isn't
Turbo C++ the same thing as Borland C++?

[dav]    aka
David Emrich
gude@uniwa.uwa.edu.au
Technical Details
Message-ID: <18fqjgINNaio@uniwa.uwa.edu.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uniwa.uwa.edu.au!uniwa.uwa.edu.au!nfm

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uniwa.uwa.edu.au!uniwa.uwa.edu.au!nfm
From: gude@uniwa.uwa.edu.au (David J W Emrich)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Borland C++ vs Turbo C++
Date: 7 Sep 1992 22:56:48 +0800
Organization: The University of Westrn Australia
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <18fqjgINNaio@uniwa.uwa.edu.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: uniwa.uwa.edu.au