🚀 go-pugleaf

> I think it is mostly price. BorlandC is supposed to be the
> "professional" compiler, while TurboC is the entry level.
> 
> If i am wrong, i'd like to be corrected.
> 
> 						Glauber
> 
> -- 
> Glauber Ribeiro - Wheaton College, IL  (USA)
>                   glauber@david.wheaton.edu 
>                   glauber@vpnet.chi.il.us


You are right if "entry level" means that you won't be able to design
Windows applications.
If you want to program under DOS only, Turbo C++ 3.0 for DOS, is far better
than an entry level compiler. It is an excellent DOS compiler.

But, the 3.0 version comes with only one manual, and explain only C++ 
programming. There is no Standard Library reference manual. It sounds like
Borland wants to withdraw from the pure C world. Older products used to be
more carefully designed, the packages had a complete set of books.


Sincerely,

Steve Jordi                

+-------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
| Dpt of Geophysics       | Fax: + 41 22 320-5732                        |
| University of Geneva    |                                              |
| 13, Rue des Maraichers  | E-Mail: Internet:   jordi@sc2a.unige.ch      |
| 1211 GENEVA 4           |         Bitnet:     jordi@cgeuge52.bitnet    |
| Switzerland             |         Compuserve: 70143,3056 (once a week) |
+-------------------------+----------------------------------------------+