Stacker vs. SuperStor

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc

Article #1636

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Previous Next

#1636

From: ezachris
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 1992 20:40

13 lines
787 bytes

I (too) am running out of diskspace and Stacker and SuperStor came to  
mind. SuperStor will give you compressed floppies, which Stacker won't.

Which is better?
Any difference in performance (compression ration/speed)?



Thanks in advance.

E. Zachrisen
ezachris@cherokee.ucs.indiana.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <BuA1Eu.480@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!news

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!news
From: ezachris@cochiti.ucs.indiana.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Stacker vs. SuperStor
Keywords: Data Compression
Message-ID: <BuA1Eu.480@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
Date: 8 Sep 92 20:40:05 GMT
Sender: news@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Indiana University
Lines: 13
Nntp-Posting-Host: cochiti.ucs.indiana.edu