Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #1677Re: Borland C++ vs Turbo C++
From: martin.brilliant
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 15:03
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 15:03
15 lines
1111 bytes
1111 bytes
From article <1992Sep8.170415.24800@bluemtn.COM>, by gregp@bluemtn.COM (Greg Philmon): > .... > BC includes more powerful, standalone tools for developing, such as the > excellent Turbo Debugger, profiler, etc. BC is an optimizing (sp?) compiler, > TC is not. I'm confused. Maybe that only applies to the current release. I bought a used copy of Turbo C++ 1.0 which includes debugger, profiles, and assembler, and I think it has optimization in the compiler. I know it's "Turbo," not "Borland," because I have to change "bcc" to "tcc" in makefiles. Marty marty@hoqaa.att.com hoqaa!marty Martin B. Brilliant (Winnertech Corporation)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep10.150327.12901@cbfsb.cb.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsc!cbfsb!cbnewsb.cb.att.com!mbbReferences:
<1992Sep8.170415.24800@bluemtn.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsc!cbfsb!cbnewsb.cb.att.com!mbb From: mbb@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (martin.brilliant) Subject: Re: Borland C++ vs Turbo C++ Message-ID: <1992Sep10.150327.12901@cbfsb.cb.att.com> Sender: news@cbfsb.cb.att.com Organization: AT&T References: <1992Sep8.170415.24800@bluemtn.COM> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 15:03:27 GMT Lines: 15