Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #1702Re: Borland C++ vs Turbo C++
From: exuptr
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 22:46
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1992 22:46
39 lines
2800 bytes
2800 bytes
In article <1992Sep10.182949.18662@mksol.dseg.ti.com> mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539) writes:
>In <1992Sep10.150327.12901@cbfsb.cb.att.com> mbb@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (martin.brilliant) writes:
>>I'm confused. Maybe that only applies to the current release. I bought
>>a used copy of Turbo C++ 1.0 which includes debugger, profiles, and
>>assembler, and I think it has optimization in the compiler. I know
>>it's "Turbo," not "Borland," because I have to change "bcc" to "tcc"
>>in makefiles.
>Yes, you are confused. Note the use of the phrase "stand-alone"
>above. He's not talking about debugging from inside the IDE. Also,
>Turbo C++ does indeed have SOME optimization -- BCC++ has a lot more.
Ok, ok...
Turbo C++ *Professional* ALSO has stand-alone debuggers and profilers and
assemblers. But Turbo C++ only compiles for DOS. Now, there is a Turbo C++
for Windows, which is pretty new. It does not make DOS programs.
Borland C++ is basically "everything", and then some. It has everything
Turbo C++ Professional and Turbo C++ has, plus it makes more efficient code,
plus you can order it with Application Frameworks and you get BOTH Turbo
Vision and Object Windows, which are Object-Oriented application frameworks
for DOS and Windows, respectively.
Borland C++ also gives you the run-time library source, starting with
version (3.0 or 3.1, I don't remember), which is extra for Turbo C++.
In a nutshell, if you want just a C++ compiler, buy Turbo C++. If you want
the kitchen sink, too, buy Borland C++.
Oh, Borland C++ is a lot more expensive and weighs about 25 lbs with App
Frameworks ;-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"This must be Thursday. I never could get the hang of Thursdays"
- Douglas Adams
- Patrick Taylor (Arthur Dent)
Ericsson Network Systems
exuptr@exu.ericsson.se "Don't let the .se fool you"
or exuptr@ZGNews.Lonestar.Org, exu.exuptr@memo.ericsson.se
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<exuptr.499.716165169@exu.ericsson.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!sun-barr!news2me.ebay.sun.com!cronkite.Central.Sun.COM!texsun!exucom.exu.ericsson.se!newsReferences:
<1992Sep8.170415.24800@bluemtn.COM> <1992Sep10.150327.12901@cbfsb.cb.att.com> <1992Sep10.182949.18662@mksol.dseg.ti.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!sun-barr!news2me.ebay.sun.com!cronkite.Central.Sun.COM!texsun!exucom.exu.ericsson.se!news From: exuptr@exu.ericsson.se (exuptr@exu.ericsson.se) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: Borland C++ vs Turbo C++ Message-ID: <exuptr.499.716165169@exu.ericsson.se> Date: 10 Sep 92 22:46:09 GMT References: <1992Sep8.170415.24800@bluemtn.COM> <1992Sep10.150327.12901@cbfsb.cb.att.com> <1992Sep10.182949.18662@mksol.dseg.ti.com> Sender: news@exu.ericsson.se Organization: Ericsson Network Systems, Inc. Lines: 39 Nntp-Posting-Host: pc254167.exu.ericsson.se