Re: Borland C++ vs Turbo C++

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc

Article #1726

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Previous Next

#1726

From: Joe Clark
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 11:26

4 lines
595 bytes

Discussion of differences between Turbo C++ and Borland C++...

Does Borland C++ have a different (i.e. better) graphics library
than Turbo C++?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <BuEvrJ.2uL@news.larc.nasa.gov>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.larc.nasa.gov!ziggy.larc.nasa.gov!joe

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.larc.nasa.gov!ziggy.larc.nasa.gov!joe
From: joe@ziggy.larc.nasa.gov (Joe Clark)
Subject: Re: Borland C++ vs Turbo C++
Message-ID: <BuEvrJ.2uL@news.larc.nasa.gov>
Originator: joe@ziggy.larc.nasa.gov
Sender: news@news.larc.nasa.gov (USENET Network News)
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA  USA
Distribution: usa
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 11:26:07 GMT
Lines: 8