Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #1730Re: Do non-Microsoft companies (legally) produce DOS5, Win3.1?
From: Joe Morris
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 12:54
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 12:54
61 lines
3739 bytes
3739 bytes
echuang@cco.caltech.edu (Ernest Y. Chuang) writes: >I just bought a new computer which came with MS-DOS 5.0 and Win 3.1, >but they weren't just preloaded on the hard drive -- they were in >shrink-wrapped boxes complete with manual and floppies. What confuses >me is that they don't appear to be the genuine Microsoft products. > [...] >it doesn't seem like they're trying to disguise their origin, but I >wouldn't have thought that Microsoft would license anyone else to >produce their software. Assuming that you are located at Cal Tech (per your userid) there should be a nearby Microsoft office you can call to check on this, but my guess is that the boxes you received are probably legitimate. Since Microsoft has been rather enthusiastic about going after pirate groups which are illegally copying its products I suspect that they would welcome a call from someone actually taking the time to verify that their copy was legitimate. Microsoft has signed agreements with numerous hardware vendors which calls for them to bundle MS-DOS and Windows with their systems. (One reason for this is to make it less likely that the users will buy OS/2: buyers frequently aren't given an option *not* to "purchase" the DOS package. Followups on this issue to *.advocacy, please.) Some vendors just take the shrink-wrapped Microsoft product and throw them in the shipping cartons when a system is purchased. Other vendors (apparently) take the MS files and repackage them in boxes with their own logo. The code is identical to what you can buy from Microsoft. And finally, some vendors take the MS-DOS or Windows files and customize them to some degree. The biggest vendor to do this is IBM: PC-DOS is MS-DOS as modified by IBM. Compaq is another vendor which does this. The modified DOS files are often enhanced to interface with special features of a manufacturer's system. For example, I've got a Toshiba laptop with Toshiba's hack of DOS. The special feature in the Toshiba version is support for the pop-up hardware control panel and various power-saving features, which are unavailable if you are running the generic MS-DOS. You probably need to check with the manufacturer of the system you bought (but didn't identify in your posting) to see if the DOS is modified or not, and if your system has critical features which are available only with the DOS shipped with it. I would expect that there would be no legal reason why you couldn't sell the unused copies of DOS, but be warned that many of the repackaged MS products with OEM logos are actually licensed to the OEM vendor and not to the individual user. The effect of this is that the registration for the package (as far as Microsoft is concerned) lies with the vendor and not with you. Upgrades for the code and technical support may be available only from the OEM and not from Microsoft, and there may be no way for whoever buys the boxes from you to register it. (Gateway is an example of this, although many Gateway owners report that it offers upgrades at prices *below* what you have to pay for the standard Microsoft product...even after street-price discount.) Joe Morris
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<jcmorris.716216045@mwunix>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!linus!linus.mitre.org!jcmorrisReferences:
<1992Sep11.080627.4288@cco.caltech.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!linus!linus.mitre.org!jcmorris From: jcmorris@mwunix.mitre.org (Joe Morris) Subject: Re: Do non-Microsoft companies (legally) produce DOS5, Win3.1? Message-ID: <jcmorris.716216045@mwunix> Sender: news@linus.mitre.org (News Service) Nntp-Posting-Host: mwunix.mitre.org Organization: The MITRE Corporation References: <1992Sep11.080627.4288@cco.caltech.edu> Distribution: usa Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 12:54:05 GMT Lines: 61