Re: Borland C++ vs Turbo C++

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc

Article #1749

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Previous Next

#1749

From: n65j
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 22:18

17 lines
1222 bytes

In article <1992Sep10.150327.12901@cbfsb.cb.att.com>,
mbb@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (martin.brilliant) writes: 
> From article <1992Sep8.170415.24800@bluemtn.COM>, by gregp@bluemtn.COM (Greg Philmon):
>> ....
>> BC includes more powerful, standalone tools for developing, such as the 
>> excellent Turbo Debugger, profiler, etc.  BC is an optimizing (sp?) compiler,
>> TC is not.
> 
> I'm confused.  Maybe that only applies to the current release.  I bought
> a used copy of Turbo C++ 1.0 which includes debugger, profiles, and
> assembler, and I think it has optimization in the compiler.  I know
> it's "Turbo," not "Borland," because I have to change "bcc" to "tcc"
> in makefiles.
> 
> 							Marty
> marty@hoqaa.att.com		hoqaa!marty
> Martin B. Brilliant		(Winnertech Corporation)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Sep11.181848.14857@vax5.cit.cornell.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!vax5.cit.cornell.edu!n65j

References: <1992Sep8.170415.24800@bluemtn.COM> <1992Sep10.150327.12901@cbfsb.cb.att.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!vax5.cit.cornell.edu!n65j
From: n65j@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Borland C++ vs Turbo C++
Message-ID: <1992Sep11.181848.14857@vax5.cit.cornell.edu>
Date: 11 Sep 92 18:18:48 EDT
References: <1992Sep8.170415.24800@bluemtn.COM> <1992Sep10.150327.12901@cbfsb.cb.att.com>
Distribution: comp
Organization: Cornell University
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message