🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #1771

Re: Opinions on Stacker

#1771
From: Mark W. Schumann
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 16:38
22 lines
1555 bytes
runyan@cup.hp.com (Mark Runyan) writes:
>Gordon.Edwards@AtlantaGA.NCR.COM (Gordon Edwards) writes:
>>What are people's opinions on Stacker?
>                                     Of course, any diskettes that I've
>stacked can't be taken to another system unless the other system is
>running Stacker...

Wrong.  Unless you "stack" the floppy drive itself--and I don't know
anyone who does--files copied to diskettes are UnStacked there.  I
do this all the time, as my home machine is Stackerized and my work
machine is not.

This makes perfect sense when you consider that Stacker operates sort
of "under" the DOS file access interrupts.  By the time DOS gets a
look at your data when reading a Stackerized file, the information
has already been uncompressed.  If the floppy drive is not itself
Stackerized, you are just copying a normal stream of bytes to the
diskette.
-- 
Mark W. Schumann/3111 Mapledale Avenue/Cleveland, Ohio 44109-2447 USA
Preferred: mark@whizbang.wariat.org | Alternative: catfood@wariat.org
"Aren't you glad you didn't marry someone dumber than you?" --my wife
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Sep12.163838.27498@wariat.org>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!wariat!catfood
References: <Gordon.Edwards.54.0@AtlantaGA.NCR.COM> <BuF6yC.En8@cup.hp.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!wariat!catfood
From: catfood@wariat.org (Mark W. Schumann)
Subject: Re: Opinions on Stacker
Message-ID: <1992Sep12.163838.27498@wariat.org>
Organization: Akademia Pana Kleksa, Publi Access UNI* Site
References: <Gordon.Edwards.54.0@AtlantaGA.NCR.COM> <BuF6yC.En8@cup.hp.com>
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 16:38:38 GMT
Lines: 22