Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #1771Re: Opinions on Stacker
From: Mark W. Schumann
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 16:38
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 16:38
22 lines
1555 bytes
1555 bytes
runyan@cup.hp.com (Mark Runyan) writes: >Gordon.Edwards@AtlantaGA.NCR.COM (Gordon Edwards) writes: >>What are people's opinions on Stacker? > Of course, any diskettes that I've >stacked can't be taken to another system unless the other system is >running Stacker... Wrong. Unless you "stack" the floppy drive itself--and I don't know anyone who does--files copied to diskettes are UnStacked there. I do this all the time, as my home machine is Stackerized and my work machine is not. This makes perfect sense when you consider that Stacker operates sort of "under" the DOS file access interrupts. By the time DOS gets a look at your data when reading a Stackerized file, the information has already been uncompressed. If the floppy drive is not itself Stackerized, you are just copying a normal stream of bytes to the diskette. -- Mark W. Schumann/3111 Mapledale Avenue/Cleveland, Ohio 44109-2447 USA Preferred: mark@whizbang.wariat.org | Alternative: catfood@wariat.org "Aren't you glad you didn't marry someone dumber than you?" --my wife
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep12.163838.27498@wariat.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!wariat!catfoodReferences:
<Gordon.Edwards.54.0@AtlantaGA.NCR.COM> <BuF6yC.En8@cup.hp.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!wariat!catfood From: catfood@wariat.org (Mark W. Schumann) Subject: Re: Opinions on Stacker Message-ID: <1992Sep12.163838.27498@wariat.org> Organization: Akademia Pana Kleksa, Publi Access UNI* Site References: <Gordon.Edwards.54.0@AtlantaGA.NCR.COM> <BuF6yC.En8@cup.hp.com> Distribution: usa Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 16:38:38 GMT Lines: 22