Re: Stacker vs. SuperStor

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc

Article #1781

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Previous Next

#1781

From: Gordon Edwards
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1992 00:23

13 lines
1051 bytes

In <BuA1Eu.480@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> ezachris@cochiti.ucs.indiana.edu writes:
>I (too) am running out of diskspace and Stacker and SuperStor came to  
>mind. SuperStor will give you compressed floppies, which Stacker won't.

Stacker 2.0 will work on floppies, and on bernoulli drives and RAM drives.

-- Gordon

-- 
=============================================================================
Gordon Edwards, N4VPH              |         "Nothing Unreal Exists"
NCR Engineering & Manufacturing    |
gedwards@ncratl.atlantaga.ncr.com  |  Kiri-Kin-Tha's First Law of Metaphysics

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9074@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!ncratl!gedwards

References: <BuA1Eu.480@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!ncratl!gedwards
From: gedwards@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM (Gordon Edwards)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Stacker vs. SuperStor
Keywords: Data Compression
Message-ID: <9074@ncratl.AtlantaGA.NCR.COM>
Date: 13 Sep 92 00:23:49 GMT
References: <BuA1Eu.480@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
Distribution: usa
Organization: NCR Engineering and Manufacturing Atlanta -- Atlanta, GA
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message