🚀 go-pugleaf

In <1992Sep11.034115.21253@cbfsb.cb.att.com> mbb@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (martin.brilliant) writes:

>From article <1992Sep10.182949.18662@mksol.dseg.ti.com>, by mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539):
>> 
>> Yes, you are confused.  Note the use of the phrase "stand-alone"
>> above.  He's not talking about debugging from inside the IDE.  Also,
>> Turbo C++ does indeed have SOME optimization -- BCC++ has a lot more. 

>Not that confused.  I've never used it, but I have a User's Guide for
>a standalone Turbo Debugger with its own UI.  Don't knock the Turbo
>product any more than it deserves.

I wasn't aware that anyone was 'knocking' anything; merely trying to
help the poor guy understand what the current product line looks like.
What version is that User's Guide you have?  I have one like that,
too, that shipped with the Turbo C++ 1.0 PROFESSIONAL package (but the
debugger is Turbo Debugger 2.0).  This is the package that is called
BORLAND C++ 3.1, in its current incarnation.

[Presumably the Turbo Pascal line has a debugger -- do they share the
same one?  In fact, they may still call it Turbo Debugger when it
ships with the Borland C++ bundle -- my docs for that are at home, and
I never paid any attention before.]

-- 
"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
 in the real world."   -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.