🚀 go-pugleaf

From article <1992Sep14.215452.24171@mksol.dseg.ti.com>, by mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539):
> In <1992Sep11.034115.21253@cbfsb.cb.att.com> mbb@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (martin.brilliant) writes:
> [ about confusion about Turbo C++ vs. Borland C++, particuarly with regard
	to the stand-alone debugger ]
> 
> What version is that User's Guide you have?  I have one like that,
> too, that shipped with the Turbo C++ 1.0 PROFESSIONAL package (but the
> debugger is Turbo Debugger 2.0).  This is the package that is called
> BORLAND C++ 3.1, in its current incarnation.
> 
> [Presumably the Turbo Pascal line has a debugger -- do they share the
> same one?  In fact, they may still call it Turbo Debugger when it
> ships with the Borland C++ bundle -- my docs for that are at home, and
> I never paid any attention before.]

I'm not confused any more.  Apparently the Turbo C++ v1.0 Professional
I have is the last of its kind under that name.

The Debugger I have signs on as version 2.0.  The manual says it's for
C, Pascal, and assembler, and supports C++, and the user interface is
consistent with that.  I've never actually used it, though.  The
package as I got it (used) included manuals for both Debugger (1.0)
and Debugger 2.0; I thought that was a mistake.

							Marty
marty@hoqaa.att.com		hoqaa!marty
Martin B. Brilliant		(Winnertech Corporation)