Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #1844Re: New Stacker
From: Fuzzy Fox
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 18:25
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 18:25
25 lines
1561 bytes
1561 bytes
kris@microware.com (Kris Hoffmeyer) writes: >I don't understand how stacker does not have slack space... >Stacker does allow you to set the file block size, but it installs >at 8K blocks, right? So if a file or it's last block is less than >8K, the rest is "slack", isn't it? It's true that DOS will not use this space, but Stacker is not DOS. Stacker will store other data in the unused space. This is a major way that Stacker achieves its data compression. The STACVOL file used by Stacker has 512-byte clusters internally. Stacker tells DOS that it uses 8K clusters, but inside, where you can't see, it uses 512-byte clusters. DOS has the wrong idea about what is actually going on in its clusters. This raises the point that if a program expects to write data beyond the EOF for a file (some virus protectors might do this), then these programs will not work with Stacker. Has anyone seen this behavior? -- #ifdef TRUE | Fuzzy Fox fuzzy@netcom.com #define TRUE 0 | a.k.a. David DeSimone an207@cleveland.freenet.edu #define FALSE 1 | #endif | How's my posting? Call 1-800-ALT-FLAME
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep15.182509.2344@rei.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!rei2!foxReferences:
<Steven_P._Oliver.036w@bearsden.UUCP> <1992Sep10.165416.14551@rei.com> <1992Sep14.193532.4713@microware.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!rei2!fox From: fox@rei.com (Fuzzy Fox) Subject: Re: New Stacker Message-ID: <1992Sep15.182509.2344@rei.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 18:25:09 GMT References: <Steven_P._Oliver.036w@bearsden.UUCP> <1992Sep10.165416.14551@rei.com> <1992Sep14.193532.4713@microware.com> Organization: Recognition Equipment, Inc. Lines: 25