Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #1996Re: Windows 3.0 and 286's.
From: Jim Winer AT&T, Middletown, NJ
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 1990 15:00
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 1990 15:00
13 lines
1044 bytes
1044 bytes
In article <6502.26aa2645@uwovax.uwo.ca>, singer@uwovax.uwo.ca writes: > Has anybody had any experience with Windows 3.0 and a straightforward > 286 with 1 mb? I wonder if 3.0 and its programs are really workable > with such machines and configurations? Works okay on my DELL 220, but it's slower than 2.11. I also have turned off shadow RAM so that I have 384 K of expanded available. Jim Winer -- jwi@mtfme.att.com -- Opinions not represent employer. ------------------------------------------------------------------ "No, no: the purpose of language is to cast spells on other people ..." Lisa S Chabot
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Jul23.150043.12341@cbnewsj.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!cbnewsj!jwiReferences:
<6502.26aa2645@uwovax.uwo.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!cbnewsj!jwi From: jwi@cbnewsj.att.com (Jim Winer @ AT&T, Middletown, NJ) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: Windows 3.0 and 286's. Summary: Works okay, but slower than 2.11 Message-ID: <1990Jul23.150043.12341@cbnewsj.att.com> Date: 23 Jul 90 15:00:43 GMT References: <6502.26aa2645@uwovax.uwo.ca> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 13