🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4014@rtifs1.UUCP> bcw@rti.rti.org (Bruce Wright) writes:

   In article <312@saxony.pa.reuter.COM>, dgil@pa.reuter.COM (Dave Gillett) writes:
   > In <5433@plains.UUCP> bezenek@plains.NoDak.edu (Todd M. Bezenek KO0N) writes:
   > >	o  A 43 line mode.
   > Why?  This might be handy for talking to hosts that expect teletypes (real or
   > glass), but full-screen hosts expect say, a VT-100, to have 24 display lines
   > and so will never make use of the extra 18--you'll just have to squint to
   > read the tiny characters. 


}   I think I remember someone saying that Procomm supported this, but
}   I'm not certain and am not familiar with the product.

}						   Bruce C. Wright

No, Procomm doesn't; this is one of the very few failings of Procomm.

Are there machines that don't know how to deal with larger screens?
With the exception of an aging IBM4381-Q14, all the machines (that I use)
here at Lehigh will support >24X80.  Even most BBS systems can be set to
any size terminal.

John.

----------------------------------------
John Early                             |
jearly@lehi3b15.csee.lehigh.edu        |  I was just a child then;
JPE1@Lehigh.Bitnet                     |  now I'm only a man.  [pf]
LUJPE@VAX1.cc.lehigh.edu               |