Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #2656Re: 1024x768 monitors: 14" vs. 16+"
From: "Carlos G. Mendioroz"
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 1990 12:12
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 1990 12:12
13 lines
1002 bytes
1002 bytes
piety@hplred.HP.COM (Bob Piety) writes: >But, if I had to have the hi-res, non-interlaced, I'd seriously look >into the NEC-4D or other monitor. I did *not* like the Sony 1304. >Bob Be warned though, if you are upgrading the monitor, that the 4-D may not work with certain cards, specially those that give interlaced hi-res modes. The 4-D starts syncing at 30KHz, not at 15 - 16 as most 14" multisync's do... You may say that it makes no sense using a non-interlaced hi-res monitor (as the 4-D) with an 'interlaced' card, but that's another point...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<90Aug24.081141edt.2787@ois.db.toronto.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!ois.db.toronto.edu!tronReferences:
<19265@ttidca.TTI.COM> <100010001@hplred.HP.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!ois.db.toronto.edu!tron
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
From: tron@db.toronto.edu ("Carlos G. Mendioroz")
Subject: Re: 1024x768 monitors: 14" vs. 16+"
Message-ID: <90Aug24.081141edt.2787@ois.db.toronto.edu>
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
References: <19265@ttidca.TTI.COM> <100010001@hplred.HP.COM>
Date: 24 Aug 90 12:12:20 GMT
Lines: 13