🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <2431@dsacg4.dsac.dla.mil> nol2321@dsacg4.dsac.dla.mil (Jim Dunn) writes:
>Someone had complained about Buerg's new ListPlus.  Or rather, about the
>lists.com and listr.com.  But you see, the reason that these smaller ver.
>of the large program don't have help, etc. is so that they can run in a
>small amount of memory.  When I shell to DOS from Clarkson Univ's TelBin,
>or NCSA Telnet, I have only a few K to work in, and lists.com is a great
>answer to my dilemma, especially since I WON'T use LESS.COM!
>
>:)
>Jim

I wasn't complaining about ListPlus.  I said that it worked just fine
under DOS but not under 4DOS and asked for help or clarification on that
point.  

In point of fact, although it's quite irrelevant, my version of LISTR.COM
_does_ have help.