🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #2922

LIM 3.2 v.s. LIM 4.0

#2922
From: Wind Chen
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 1990 07:55
12 lines
1015 bytes
Larry Jones writes : Does this board support LIM 4.0 is a question should
                     never be asked.

I would like to use a very strong word to point out this is DEADLY wrong.
For the 80286 system, if you plan to buy an Expanded Memory Board, do yourself
a favor, make sure it supports LIM 4.0.  When you ask this question to any
vendor, it means "Does this board have REGISTERS to support LIM 4.0 or not".

I am so surprised that someone still think software emulation is better than
hardware function and is the only thing you need.

~.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <26429@bellcore.bellcore.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!bellcore-2!bellcore!cellar.bae.bellcore.com!wind

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!bellcore-2!bellcore!cellar.bae.bellcore.com!wind
From: wind@cellar.bae.bellcore.com (Wind Chen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: LIM 3.2 v.s. LIM 4.0
Message-ID: <26429@bellcore.bellcore.com>
Date: 4 Sep 90 07:55:15 GMT
Sender: news@bellcore.bellcore.com
Reply-To: wind@cellar.bae.bellcore.com (Wind Chen)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Bell Communications Research
Lines: 12