Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #3224Re: Kb or kb (was Re: DR-DOS ver 5.0)
From: Peter Lim
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 1990 17:58
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 1990 17:58
42 lines
2525 bytes
2525 bytes
I've asked this question twice with no answer; and I'm going to ask
it again !
With DR DOS loaded and about 620 Kb free, CAN YOU RUN WINDOWS 3.0 in
386 ENHANCED MODE ? If NOT, than it is just TOO BAD, and looks like
DR misses the boat again.
> Mark Aitchison, Physics, University of Canterbury, New Zealand. wrote .....
>
> I personally think it is the responsibility of the operating system to
> recognise the extra memory, quite apart from the slight efficiency gains in
> putting such stuff into the o/s rather than an add-on product. This isn't to
> say these products aren't wonderful, rather Microsoft has been dragging its
> feet (in my humble opinion) for too long.
>
I agree completely (also that Microsoft was dragging their feet).
However, there's a distinction between theoretical/academic computer
science and practical/real-world computer science. Basically, in my
opinion, IBM PC and MS-DOS provides an environment where all the sins
in computer science were committed :-). The BIOS is too slow, so people
pokes the hardware directly. The OS is a dog so people patched and hack
it to speed.
BUT ! MS-DOS become the standard and CP/M-86 is forgotten. In fact,
I thought CP/M was much better designed than MS-DOS. It is re-entrant
and task switching overhead is low. BUT ! Like I said, they missed the
boat because they are not MS-DOS compatible. Now, the world is jumping
on the Windows 3.0 platform. Is DR DOS going to miss the boat again ?
Anybody want to supply the answer ?
Regards, ## Life is fast enough as it is ........
Peter Lim. ## .... DON'T PUSH IT !! >>>-------,
########################################### :
E-mail: plim@hpsgwg.HP.COM Snail-mail: Hewlett Packard Singapore, :
Tel: (065)-279-2289 (ICDS, ICS) |
Telnet: 520-2289 1150 Depot Road, __\@/__
... also at: pnl@hpfipnl.HP.COM Singapore 0410. SPLAT !
#include <standard_disclaimer.hpp>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<35010010@hpfinote.HP.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!hpfcso!hpfinote!pnlReferences:
<1990Aug27.122011.9017@canterbury.ac.nz>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!hpfcso!hpfinote!pnl From: pnl@hpfinote.HP.COM (Peter Lim) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: Kb or kb (was Re: DR-DOS ver 5.0) Message-ID: <35010010@hpfinote.HP.COM> Date: 29 Aug 90 17:58:54 GMT References: <1990Aug27.122011.9017@canterbury.ac.nz> Organization: Hewlett Packard CICD Lines: 42