386 vs. 386sx

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc

Article #3259

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Previous Next

#3259

From: Lee Jarvie
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 1990 02:22

9 lines
890 bytes

	Just have to get in my 2 cents.  A 386sx is a great machine.  Granted,
it is a little slower, but don't worry about it.  It's not that slow.  I
have one myself with HD floppies, VGA, trackball and 110 Meg hard drive.
 I love it.  It is a desktop model and is smaller than the XT's I see
around.  They're a great little machine, don't worry about any bad reviews.

Lee
lj359831@longs.lance.colostate.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9205@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!boulder!ccncsu!longs.LANCE.ColoState.EDU!lj359831

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!boulder!ccncsu!longs.LANCE.ColoState.EDU!lj359831
From: lj359831@longs.LANCE.ColoState.EDU (Lee Jarvie)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: 386 vs. 386sx
Message-ID: <9205@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU>
Date: 19 Sep 90 02:22:42 GMT
Sender: news@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU
Reply-To: lj359831@longs.LANCE.ColoState.EDU (Lee Jarvie)
Organization: Engineering College, Colorado State University
Lines: 9