Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #360Re: 486/50's vs Sun 2's
From: Stuart Woolford
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 21:35
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 21:35
40 lines
2610 bytes
2610 bytes
spagiola@amy5.stanford.edu (Stefano P. Pagiola) writes: >*** Irving Hofman ** writes >> PC-Magazine recently compared the speed of a 486/50, >> Sun, Next, Mac, etc and found that the 486/50 was the >> fastest of the lot. They conducted benchtests by timing >> certain processor intensive operations in >> wordprocessors, spreadsheets, and desktop publishing >> using the same programs on all platforms. It is quite >> interesting reading.... >> >But at least in regard to the one comparison I was able to replicate >myself (scrolling WP on 486 vs NeXT) quite unreliable. The 486/50 >was in fact quite fast at scrolling WordPerfect, but no more so than >the NeXT (non-turbo). Bearing in mind that the 486 was scrolling WP >(DOS version) in text mode (ie without showing actual text formatting >other than by color changes, and without displaying embedded >graphics) while the NeXT was scrolling fully-formatted text (font + >size changes) _and_ the embedded graphics, I was more impressed with >the NeXT. >Two caveats: 1. in both cases the initial run through the document >was in fact faster on the 486; once the entire document was in RAM, >there was no difference in scrolling speed. 2. for a fair test, you >need to use the scroll bar in the NeXT WP version; using the >line-at-a-time scroll arrows is very slow, about as slow as scrolling >by repeatedly hitting the down cursor key on the 486 rather than >holding it down. >I couldn't judge how fair or accurate the tests of other programs and >other platforms were, for lack of direct experience or boxes to try >it on. perhaps this would have more to do with the key-repeat rate on the 486 ?? also: a 486 running 32bit OS/2 2.0 programs is about 4 time faster on integer code ( let alone floating point ) than the same machine under dos. (ie: think about what you are actually measuring !!!) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- stuartw@ccu1.aukuni.ac.nz >>>>In VI Where Available<<<< ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul27.213527.26349@ccu1.aukuni.ac.nz>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!comp.vuw.ac.nz!waikato.ac.nz!aukuni.ac.nz!stuartwReferences:
<1992Jul27.054828.21618@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> <1992Jul27.173410.19470@leland.Stanford.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!comp.vuw.ac.nz!waikato.ac.nz!aukuni.ac.nz!stuartw Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: 486/50's vs Sun 2's Message-ID: <1992Jul27.213527.26349@ccu1.aukuni.ac.nz> From: stuartw@ccu1.aukuni.ac.nz (Stuart Woolford) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 21:35:27 GMT References: <1992Jul27.054828.21618@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> <1992Jul27.173410.19470@leland.Stanford.EDU> Organization: University of Auckland, New Zealand. Lines: 40