Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #3670Re: Turbo Pascal vs C vs REAL PROGRAMMERS!
From: phys169
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 1990 00:42
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 1990 00:42
19 lines
1295 bytes
1295 bytes
In article <5039@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au>, rhys@batserver.cs.uq.oz.au (Rhys Weatherley) writes: > noren@dinl.uucp (Charles Noren) writes: >>C++ is the language of choice of REAL programmers... >> Remember, if it can't be done in C++, it isn't worth doing! >>...just kidding :-) :-) :-) :-) !! > > I'll no doubt get flamed for this, but I couldn't resist :-)... > "Real programmers don't write in PASCAL, BLISS or ADA, or > any of those pinky computer science languages... REAL programmers might write in C(++), but COMPLEX programmers write in FORTRAN!! :-) INTEGER programmers write in ZX80 BASIC DOUBLE-PRECISION INTEGER programmers write in DG Business BASIC EXTENDED programmers write in Turbo Pascal And thome programmerth even write in LITHP. Mark Aitchison, Uni of Canty, New Zealand.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Oct5.114353.9325@canterbury.ac.nz>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!comp.vuw.ac.nz!virtue!canterbury.ac.nz!phys169References:
<F*=-d162@cs.psu.edu> <51440005@hpindda.cup.hp.com> <1752@dinl.mmc.UUCP> <5039@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!comp.vuw.ac.nz!virtue!canterbury.ac.nz!phys169 From: phys169@canterbury.ac.nz Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: Turbo Pascal vs C vs REAL PROGRAMMERS! Message-ID: <1990Oct5.114353.9325@canterbury.ac.nz> Date: 5 Oct 90 00:42:49 GMT References: <F*=-d162@cs.psu.edu> <51440005@hpindda.cup.hp.com> <1752@dinl.mmc.UUCP> <5039@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> Organization: University of Canterbury Lines: 19