Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #3958New Magellan Slower than Original?
From: singer
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 1990 00:50
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 1990 00:50
14 lines
1178 bytes
1178 bytes
Magellan is a very impressive hard disk tool, especially if you have umpteen
text files; but I wonder if anybody else bought the the well-reviewed new
model, 2.0 (described as much faster than the original, 1.0) and found that the
update is much much slower than the original. I have compared, everything else
being constant, the old with the new and found the old was twice as fast in
seeking (exploring) for items. Has anybody else had this experience, or even
the opposite experience? --
-----------
Ben Singer Department of Sociology
University of Western Ontario
Singer@uwo.ca London, Ontario
Singer@uwovax.bitnet N6A 5C2
(519) 660-0671 (home)
(519) 679-2111 Ext 5137
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7426.271a2111@uwovax.uwo.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!ria!uwovax!singerShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!ria!uwovax!singer From: singer@uwovax.uwo.ca Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: New Magellan Slower than Original? Message-ID: <7426.271a2111@uwovax.uwo.ca> Date: 16 Oct 90 00:50:25 GMT Lines: 14