Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #4085Re: DESQview/X vs. X-terminals
From: Christopher D. Brown
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 1990 13:39
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 1990 13:39
22 lines
1428 bytes
1428 bytes
In article <kusumoto.656285930@chsun1> kusumoto@chsun1.uchicago.edu (Bob Kusumoto) writes:
#mark@infolog.se (Mark Plotnick) writes:
#>What would be the difference between this and a X-Server application
#>running under Windows-3?
#
#A different window manager at the very least (Quarterdeck is using their own
#window manager rather than olwm, twm or some other one in the standard X11
#distribution). Do you think MSWindows3 will handle DOS programs at the
#same time as your running X windows (is there an MSWindows X-window terminal
#out there already?)?
...
I don't have my references handy but at least one of XY Vision, X Sight, and
AT Vision runs as an MS Windows window. In 386 enhanced mode, Windows 3.0
can multi-task DOS and Windows apps.
cb
--
Christopher D. Brown
Digital: {uunet|cs.utexas.edu}!execu!cb
Analog: (512) 327-7070
Physical: Execucom, 108 Wild Basin Road, Two Wild Basin, Austin, TX 78764
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<26715@sequoia.execu.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!mcdchg!laidbak!ism.isc.com!uunet!snorkelwacker!apple!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!natinst!sequoia!cbReferences:
<1990Oct8.213042.1011@iowasp.physics.uiowa.edu> <251@infolog.se> <kusumoto.656285930@chsun1>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!mcdchg!laidbak!ism.isc.com!uunet!snorkelwacker!apple!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!natinst!sequoia!cb From: cb@sequoia.execu.com (Christopher D. Brown) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: DESQview/X vs. X-terminals Message-ID: <26715@sequoia.execu.com> Date: 19 Oct 90 13:39:41 GMT References: <1990Oct8.213042.1011@iowasp.physics.uiowa.edu> <251@infolog.se> <kusumoto.656285930@chsun1> Organization: Execucom Systems Corp. Lines: 22