Re: Boycott Lotus?

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc

Article #4258

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Previous Next

#4258

From: Rahul Dhesi
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 1990 19:53

14 lines
1109 bytes

In <1990Oct25.164317.27237@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>
mroussel@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Marc Roussel) writes:

     The implication seems to be that it wouldn't have mattered if
     Lotus had lost, but that they are bad guys because they won.

I think the point is that if Lotus hadn't won the lawsuit, anything it
did would have been moot and a boycott wouldn't be necessary.  You
don't have to boycott all bad guys, only those bad guys that are in a
position to practice their badness.
--
Rahul Dhesi <dhesi%cirrusl@oliveb.ATC.olivetti.com>
UUCP:  oliveb!cirrusl!dhesi
A pointer is not an address.  It is a way of finding an address. -- me

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2612@cirrusl.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!usc!apple!olivea!tymix!cirrusl!sunfire!dhesi

References: <2735@naucse.cse.nau.edu> <1990Oct23.233556.6104@agate.berkeley.edu> <1990Oct25.164317.27237@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!usc!apple!olivea!tymix!cirrusl!sunfire!dhesi
From: dhesi%cirrusl@oliveb.ATC.olivetti.com (Rahul Dhesi)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Boycott Lotus?
Keywords: pc
Message-ID: <2612@cirrusl.UUCP>
Date: 26 Oct 90 19:53:47 GMT
References: <2735@naucse.cse.nau.edu> <1990Oct23.233556.6104@agate.berkeley.edu> <1990Oct25.164317.27237@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>
Sender: news@cirrusl.UUCP
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message