Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #437Re: 486-50DX vs SPARC2 (was Re: 486/50's vs Sun 2's)
From: fred j mccall 575-3539
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 18:28
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 18:28
39 lines
2623 bytes
2623 bytes
In <1992Jul27.054828.21618@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> ins760z@lindblat.cc.monash.edu.au (*** Irving Hofman **) writes: >tholen@galileo.ifa.hawaii.edu (Dave Tholen) writes: >: Dave Ritacco writes: >: >: > Does anyone have the MIPS and MEGAFLOPS rating of a fast 486 ESA >: > system? WE are constantly arguing here at work about speeds and I was >: > wondering if anyone has benchmarked these things lately. >: >: Sorry, no MIPS or MEGAFLOPS (or SPECmarks) ratings, but rather I do have >: a real-world, number-crunching application. Assuming a 50 MHz 486 is >: twice as fast as a 25 MHz 486 (which is what I tested), then the Sparc- >: station 2 is no more than 10 percent faster than the 486. This is actually quite close. I can't speak to floating point performance, but a 486-50DX EISA machine with a 256k memory cache will usually hit right around 21 MIPS. This might actually outperform a SPARC 2, which has a similar MIPS rating but is a RISC processor (hence MIPS don't quite compare to MIPS on a CISC processor like the i486). The only place I would expect a SPARCStation 2 to radically outperform it is for graphics. [By the way, a SPARCStation 2 is a Sun 4 (as is a SPARCStation 1+, which is what the IPC is). That's why I changed the subject.] >PC-Magazine recently compared the speed of a 486/50, Sun, Next, Mac, etc and >found that the 486/50 was the fastest of the lot. They conducted benchtests >by timing certain processor intensive operations in wordprocessors, spreadsheets, and desktop publishing using the same programs on all platforms. It is quite >interesting reading.... I thought their tests were somewhat biased beforehand, since they weren't measuring anything like the same thing on each machine. It amounted to "how fast can I run PC-type applications on this machine". -- "Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live in the real world." -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jul30.182837.15169@mksol.dseg.ti.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!csc.ti.com!tilde.csc.ti.com!mksol!mccallReferences:
<1992Jul20.024153.23311@news.Hawaii.Edu> <1992Jul27.054828.21618@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!csc.ti.com!tilde.csc.ti.com!mksol!mccall From: mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539) Subject: Re: 486-50DX vs SPARC2 (was Re: 486/50's vs Sun 2's) Message-ID: <1992Jul30.182837.15169@mksol.dseg.ti.com> Organization: Texas Instruments Inc References: <1992Jul20.024153.23311@news.Hawaii.Edu> <1992Jul27.054828.21618@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 18:28:37 GMT Lines: 39