🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #437

Re: 486-50DX vs SPARC2 (was Re: 486/50's vs Sun 2's)

#437
From: fred j mccall 575-3539
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 18:28
39 lines
2623 bytes
In <1992Jul27.054828.21618@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> ins760z@lindblat.cc.monash.edu.au (*** Irving Hofman **) writes:

>tholen@galileo.ifa.hawaii.edu (Dave Tholen) writes:
>: Dave Ritacco writes:
>: 
>: >    Does anyone have the MIPS and MEGAFLOPS rating of a fast 486 ESA 
>: > system? WE are constantly arguing here at work about speeds and I was
>: > wondering if anyone has benchmarked these things lately.
>: 
>: Sorry, no MIPS or MEGAFLOPS (or SPECmarks) ratings, but rather I do have
>: a real-world, number-crunching application.  Assuming a 50 MHz 486 is
>: twice as fast as a 25 MHz 486 (which is what I tested), then the Sparc-
>: station 2 is no more than 10 percent faster than the 486.  

This is actually quite close.  I can't speak to floating point
performance, but a 486-50DX EISA machine with a 256k memory cache will
usually hit right around 21 MIPS.  This might actually outperform a
SPARC 2, which has a similar MIPS rating but is a RISC processor
(hence MIPS don't quite compare to MIPS on a CISC processor like the
i486).  The only place I would expect a SPARCStation 2 to radically
outperform it is for graphics.

[By the way, a SPARCStation 2 is a Sun 4 (as is a SPARCStation 1+,
which is what the IPC is).  That's why I changed the subject.]

>PC-Magazine recently compared the speed of a 486/50, Sun, Next, Mac, etc and
>found that the 486/50 was the fastest of the lot. They conducted benchtests
>by timing certain processor intensive operations in wordprocessors, spreadsheets, and desktop publishing using the same programs on all platforms. It is quite
>interesting reading....

I thought their tests were somewhat biased beforehand, since they
weren't measuring anything like the same thing on each machine.  It
amounted to "how fast can I run PC-type applications on this machine".

-- 
"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
 in the real world."   -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Jul30.182837.15169@mksol.dseg.ti.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!csc.ti.com!tilde.csc.ti.com!mksol!mccall
References: <1992Jul20.024153.23311@news.Hawaii.Edu> <1992Jul27.054828.21618@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!csc.ti.com!tilde.csc.ti.com!mksol!mccall
From: mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539)
Subject: Re: 486-50DX vs SPARC2 (was Re: 486/50's vs Sun 2's)
Message-ID: <1992Jul30.182837.15169@mksol.dseg.ti.com>
Organization: Texas Instruments Inc
References: <1992Jul20.024153.23311@news.Hawaii.Edu> <1992Jul27.054828.21618@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1992 18:28:37 GMT
Lines: 39