🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #5949

Re: Parity error - HALT - a better NMI handler?

#5949
From: Tom Weinstein
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 02:26
22 lines
1590 bytes
In article <3132.2404.uupcb@synapse.org>, chuck.colford@synapse.org (Chuck Colford) writes:

> Alas; I am not alone.  I am plagued by the occasional parity error too.
> Chris Granitz recently recanted his story & it sounds all too familier.
> I'm a H/W engineer, so I've gone through most of what I can check (mem
> speeds, cache data/tag ram speeds, bus speeds, looked for "pushed
> parts", etc).  Still they persist, but I hate to turn off checking.

> Speeds of 33 MHz and up are challenging & require good design & layout
> practice.  Perhaps all the clone designs do not all allow adequate
> margins.

I've found that most of the time parity errors are caused by
mis-configured memory management software.  QEMM is especially prone to
this problem.  If you fiddle around with then memory regions you use for
high memory, it usually fixes the problem.



--
Love is a conveyor belt of   |   Tom Weinstein  tomw@orac.esd.sgi.com
warmth  -- Jackie Chan       |                  tomw@bears.ucsb.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID: <TOMW.92Nov5022655@orac.asd.sgi.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!sgi!fido!fido!tomw
References: <3132.2404.uupcb@synapse.org>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!sgi!fido!fido!tomw
From: tomw@orac.asd.sgi.com (Tom Weinstein)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: Parity error - HALT - a better NMI handler?
Date: 5 Nov 92 02:26:55
Organization: Silicon Graphics Inc.
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <TOMW.92Nov5022655@orac.asd.sgi.com>
References: <3132.2404.uupcb@synapse.org>
Reply-To: tomw@asd.sgi.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: orac.asd.sgi.com
In-reply-to: chuck.colford@synapse.org's message of 3 Nov 92 22:18:00 GMT