🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Oct28.174037.5404@tandon.com>, tdbear@tandon.com (Tom Barrett) writes:
|> In article <1992Oct27.032122.29849@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> bradleyt@spot.Colorado.EDU (Todd Bradley) writes:
|> >No such device.  There has never been and will never (most likely)
|> >be a "586".
|> 
|> Actually... it would not be surprising if AMD and/or Cyrix
|> used this numbering scheme.  Intel has been threatening all of
|> their customers against using it, but that doesn't mean that
|> it can't be used by another company.
|> 
|> >| Todd Bradley -- Official Microsoft Spokesman
|> 
|> From UCSU? hehe. Yeah, right.  I'd be worried about the GG (read as
|> SS) knocking at your door.
|> 
|> -- 
|> Tom Barrett (TDBear)    tdbear@tandon.com          voice: 805-378-6207
|> Tandon Corporation      609 Science Drive          Moorpark, CA  93021 
|> Sr. HW Design Engineer  "War is Peace, No is Yes, And We're All Free!" 
|> [Note: TDBear is heading for Austin Texas in November!]

Unless someone beats me to it, let me be the one to post the OFFICIAL
name of the next Intel production...........Pentium (from InfoWorld
blurb).  

/============================================================================\
|                    ___                     |                               |
|       ___....-----'---`-----....___        | I haven't lost my mind --     |
| =========================================  |                               |
|        ___`---..._______...---'___         |  it's backed up on            |
|       (___)      _|_|_|_      (___)        |   tape somewhere.             |
|         \\____.-'_.---._`-.____//          |                               |
|           ~~~~`.__`---'__.'~~~~            | lpeters@marge.hq.af.mil       |
|                   `~~~'                    |                               |
\============================================================================/