Re: 486 vs. 386

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc

Article #6043

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Previous Next

#6043

From: Gregory Donald Moncreaff
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 02:14

8 lines
793 bytes

article <1992Nov9.200839.27999@exu.ericsson.se> exuhag@exu.ericsson.se writes:
>
>Not to mention that very few people actually need a 586 (aka Pentium).
>How many people--excepting ray-tracing fanatics and people who do
>serious number crunching--have had any speed problems with a 33 MHz
>486?  
>
does any one remember when they asked us, "who really needs a 486?"

Technical Details

Message-ID: <vjn1bhr@rpi.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!rpi!moncrg

References: <BxFpHv.8zB@news.orst.edu> <1992Nov9.200839.27999@exu.ericsson.se>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!rpi!moncrg
From: moncrg@marcus.its.rpi.edu (Gregory Donald Moncreaff)
Subject: Re: 486 vs. 386
Message-ID: <vjn1bhr@rpi.edu>
Nntp-Posting-Host: marcus.its.rpi.edu
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
References: <BxFpHv.8zB@news.orst.edu> <1992Nov9.200839.27999@exu.ericsson.se>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 02:14:20 GMT
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message