Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Article #6097Re: 486's and NeXTSTEP
From: Stefano Pagiola
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 17:34
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 17:34
55 lines
3129 bytes
3129 bytes
Brian Rogers writes > I've often wondered about NeXTSTEP for 486. How much does > it cost? Is it affordable for a Joe Schmoe like me? For that > matter, hearing you mention NeXTSTEP in the context of fast, > LocalBus, ectc. 486's is rather discouraging at times -- My > wallet cringes. > OK. First, price. Nothing has been announced yet. A $1000 price was bandied about at one time (ie competitive with other Unix offerings like SCO or Solaris), but latest rumors place it lower than that. I expect to see it in the $700 range. Before you freak out, bear in mind that this includes a whole lot of goodies that you'd normally pay extra for. Multimedia Mail. A suite of networking software including Netware client software. A variety of apps. More. Second, system requirements. To get good (ie equivalent to NeXT's own hardware) performance, you'll need pretty heavy-duty equipment, including fast data buses. Getting data to your display in particular will be a bottleneck. But to a large extent you can make your own price/performance trade-offs. (Dell and some other makers will be selling pre-configured systems with NeXTSTEP pre-installed, or you can build your own system by mix and matching components). The bottom line is that this is a very powerful OS, and it requires powerful hardware to run on. But make no mistake, if you think you'll wait for NT and not have to get the same kind of powerful hardware, you're wrong. The only reason all these new OSs can do the things they do is by having muscle to back them. Look at Windows 3.1; tried running it on a 286 lately? Yeah, it'll run, but you wouldn't want to do it every day. Ditto on NT; it might run on 386s etc, but it won't be pleasant. Look at OS/2; seen the minimum equipment specs? So yes, NeXTSTEP has high system requirements, but so will all other top-of-the-line OSs. Is it affordable? That depends on your budget. Is it worth it? I think definitely. > Or could I run NeXTSTEP and a plain ol' 386DX-33? You can pick your own performance with NeXTSTEP (ie put a slower graphics card, get slower display) but you cannot, repeat, cannot run it on 386. Period. It requires a 'true' 486 (ie some cheapo 486 clones won't work either). I have a copy of the latest 'Questions and Answers' on NeXTSTEP 486 that I'll be glad to email a copy of to anyone who requests it. -- - Stefano Pagiola Food Research Institute, Stanford University spagiola@frinext.stanford.edu (NeXTMail encouraged) spagiola@FRI-nxt-Pagiola.stanford.edu (NeXTMail encouraged)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov11.173406.525@leland.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!agate!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!newsReferences:
<kb13877@pro-storm.cts.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!agate!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!news From: spagiola@frinext.stanford.edu (Stefano Pagiola) Subject: Re: 486's and NeXTSTEP Message-ID: <1992Nov11.173406.525@leland.Stanford.EDU> Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News) Reply-To: spagiola@frinext.stanford.edu Organization: DSO, Stanford University References: <kb13877@pro-storm.cts.com> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 92 17:34:06 GMT Lines: 55